Organic ranking pages report
See which pages carry a domain's estimated search footprint and whether the retained paths form repeated page families. Open representative pages before treating a path pattern as a useful template.
Install and run the report
Install the CLI once, then run seo start to connect your site and Google data. After setup you can run this report yourself or ask your agent to run it.
Install the SEO CLI globally.
npm i -g seoRun setup after installation.
seo startRun ranking pages and patterns through the report catalog.
seo reports run ranking-pages --params '{"domain":"example.com","site":"sc-domain:example.com","countryCode":"GB","languageCode":"en","minRankedKeywords":2,"limit":50}' --jsonWhat you get from this report
Find a domain's bounded ranking-page footprint and repeated URL patterns, with optional matching Search Console page evidence.
- Best for
- You want to see which pages carry a first-party or competitor domain's estimated organic footprint.
- Needs
- Domain and provider row filters
- You get
- A bounded list of ranking pages with provider estimates, movement, ranking distribution, and optional exact Search Console matches.
- Use next
- Ranked keyword footprint
What you need before you run it
This report uses provider page URLs with estimated organic traffic, keyword counts, traffic cost, ranking distribution, and movement fields. deterministic repeated path patterns with counts, representative URLs, and evidence references. optional matching Search Console page metrics from a bounded finalised date range.
Domain and provider row filters
Provide a bounded page-level footprint with estimated traffic, keyword counts, ranking distribution, and movement.
Optional matching Search Console property
Adds retained owner-verified page metrics for exact matching URLs.
How the report finds the opportunity
The report uses existing search and page evidence to build a limited review list. An opportunity is a reason to inspect a page, not a promise of more traffic.
Validates and deduplicates provider page rows while preserving filters, pagination, totals, invalid rows, warnings, and cost.
Groups repeated path shapes into deterministic structural patterns with counts and representative URLs.
Keeps the path-pattern heuristic separate from claims about page quality, intent, demand, or how a site creates its pages.
Check the evidence behind each opportunity
Start with the query, page and date range behind each suggestion. Thin or partial evidence belongs in the review pile, not the implementation queue.
| Read first | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Result | A bounded list of ranking pages with provider estimates, movement, ranking distribution, and optional exact Search Console matches. |
| More detail | Repeated path patterns, representative URLs, evidence references, source coverage, and caveats for programmatic SEO review. |
| Read it with | Open representative pages and compare their intent, useful fields, unique value, navigation, internal links, and source data. |
What the result cannot prove
Patterns found in a filtered or paginated sample may not describe the whole domain. Estimated page traffic and keyword counts are not Search Console totals.
Open representative pages and compare their intent, useful fields, unique value, navigation, internal links, and source data. A repeated path is a prompt for review. It is not a recommendation to imitate the site or create more pages. Use a current result snapshot when live competitors or intent would change the decision.
Use a different report for these jobs
You plan to infer quality, intent, or a content generator from path structure alone. You need a complete page inventory beyond the provider and output caps.
You need the queries behind one domain or page.
Run ranked keywords with the domain or page target and the filters needed for the decision.
You need to assess a programmatic template family on a site you own.
Run the pSEO audit to add first-party performance, template, overlap, and page-quality evidence before changing a working page family.
Use the report with an agent or in code
The command above is enough for most work. These options let an agent, script or application run the same report with explicit input and structured output.
CLI
Use the report catalog when an agent, script or CI job needs predictable JSON instead of the normal terminal output. Check the current input first, then run the report with the validated parameters.
Check the current input before the agent or script runs the report.
seo reports describe ranking-pages --jsonOnce the input is valid, run the report through the report catalog.
seo reports run ranking-pages --params '{"domain":"example.com","site":"sc-domain:example.com","countryCode":"GB","languageCode":"en","minRankedKeywords":2,"limit":50}' --jsonMCP
An MCP agent follows the same two-step flow. It inspects the current schema, fills the required fields and only then runs the report.
Ask the MCP server for the current report input.
{
"id": "ranking-pages"
}Run the report after the agent has checked and filled the input.
{
"id": "ranking-pages",
"params": {
"domain": "example.com",
"site": "sc-domain:example.com",
"countryCode": "GB",
"languageCode": "en",
"minRankedKeywords": 2,
"limit": 50
}
}TypeScript
Install the package in a Node 22 project when your application needs to run the report directly. The result includes the same evidence, warnings and limits returned through the CLI and MCP server.
Add the SEO package to your project.
npm install seoRun the report from your TypeScript application.
import { executeReport } from 'seo/mcp'
const result = await executeReport(
'ranking-pages',
{
"domain": "example.com",
"site": "sc-domain:example.com",
"countryCode": "GB",
"languageCode": "en",
"minRankedKeywords": 2,
"limit": 50
},
)
console.log(result)What to do next
Open representative pages from each useful path pattern and inspect their queries, fields, source data and page value. Run the programmatic audit before expanding a first-party template, and research the data source before proposing a new one.
- 01Run ranked keywords for a representative page.
- 02Run pSEO audit before changing a working first-party template family.
- 03Use a current result snapshot when live competitors or intent would change the decision.
Related reports
Review bounded provider keyword, ranking-page, result-type, and estimate rows with an optional matching Search Console comparison.
Review repeated page families with search demand, limited crawl samples, and optional Google index evidence kept separate.
Compare up to three explicit competitors with retained Search Console themes, the site's provider footprint, and repeated ranking-page patterns.
Sources used by this report
These primary sources define the provider data or search controls used by the result.